← Selfey Science
Bodytime outdoors/green spaceAdults

The '120 Minutes a Week' Nature Finding

A large England-wide survey found that people who spent at least two hours a week in nature reported better health and wellbeing than those who spent none — with no extra benefit clearly emerging beyond that.

Study title: The '120 Minutes a Week' Nature FindingWhite MP, Alcock I, Grellier J, Wheeler BW, Hartig T, Warber SL, Bone A, Depledge MH, Fleming LE, Scientific Reports, 2019

Study type
Cross-sectional study
Population
19,806 adults in England, Monitor of Engagement with the Natural Environment Survey, 2014/15–2015/16
Published
2019
Evidence confidence
Moderate confidence

The short version

In a large England survey, people getting at least 120 minutes a week in nature reported better health and wellbeing than those getting none.

Why it matters

There may be a broad weekly threshold of time in nature associated with feeling and functioning better, but 120 minutes is a population pattern from one country's survey, not a clinically validated dose for any individual.

01

The question

Is there a recognisable weekly 'dose' of recreational time in nature associated with better self-reported health and wellbeing?

02

How it was studied

Cross-sectional survey analysis examining self-reported minutes spent in natural environments over the past week against self-reported general health and life satisfaction, adjusting for demographic, health and area-level covariates.

03

What they found

People who reported at least 120 minutes of recreational nature contact in the previous week were significantly more likely to report good health and high wellbeing than those reporting none, regardless of whether that time came in one visit or several. Benefits didn't clearly keep rising much beyond around 200–300 minutes.

04

Limitations

Cross-sectional design cannot establish causation — healthier, less busy people may simply spend more time outdoors. Nature contact and wellbeing were both self-reported, and the sample is specific to England, limiting how far the exact threshold generalises.

05

What it may mean

There may be a broad weekly threshold of time in nature associated with feeling and functioning better, but 120 minutes is a population pattern from one country's survey, not a clinically validated dose for any individual.

In real life

If a single long weekend walk feels like your only option, this data suggests accumulated shorter visits across the week were associated with a similar benefit to one long one.

Try this

Rather than planning one big outdoor outing, try tracking whether you can accumulate around 20 minutes outside on most days this week and notice how the week feels by the end.

Evidence confidence

Moderate confidence

A large, carefully analysed single survey with a notable, widely replicated-in-spirit finding, but it remains one cross-sectional dataset from one country rather than a converging body of causal evidence.

Source

White MP, Alcock I, Grellier J, Wheeler BW, Hartig T, Warber SL, Bone A, Depledge MH, Fleming LE (2019). The '120 Minutes a Week' Nature Finding. Scientific Reports.

Peer-reviewed · Free full text available · Last reviewed 2026-08-14

Read the original research →

One study isn't the whole storyOne study gives us a piece of the picture. Selfey looks for patterns across the broader evidence rather than treating a single finding as a rule.

Read this in everyday terms

The Walk That Isn't About Steps

Selfey research briefs are educational summaries, not medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Research describes patterns across groups; it cannot tell you what is right for your situation.

Turn the evidence into a plan you can actually carry out.

Self-Care Evaluation →
Tell Selfey