← Selfey Science
Mindaffect labellingAdults · Teens

Naming the feeling seems to take some of the heat out of it.

A brain-imaging study found that labelling an emotion in words was linked to calmer activity in the amygdala, the brain's threat-detection region.

Study title: Putting a Feeling Into Words May Quiet the Brain's Alarm SystemLieberman, M. D., Eisenberger, N. I., Crockett, M. J., Tom, S. M., Pfeifer, J. H., & Way, B. M., Psychological Science, 2007

Study type
Experimental study
Population
30 adults (18 in the main labelling analysis), community/student sample, USA
Published
2007
Evidence confidence
Moderate confidence

The short version

In a brain-imaging study, putting an emotion into words was associated with reduced activity in the amygdala and increased activity in a region involved in language and control. The authors read this as language-based processing dampening automatic emotional reactivity.

Why it matters

It is a small argument for specificity: 'I'm anxious about the meeting' may do something that 'I'm fine' does not.

What this doesn't mean

It does not mean naming a feeling fixes it, or that a brain-imaging result in a small group predicts how a particular hard day will go for you.

01

The question

Does putting an emotional facial expression into words change how the brain responds to it?

02

How it was studied

Participants viewed photographs of faces showing emotional expressions while undergoing fMRI. In one condition they chose a word to label the emotion shown (e.g. 'angry'); in others they matched faces or names without labelling. Researchers compared amygdala activity across conditions.

03

What they found

Labelling the emotion in words was associated with reduced activity in the amygdala and increased activity in the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, a pattern the authors interpreted as language-based processing dampening automatic emotional reactivity.

04

Limitations

Small sample (fewer than 20 in key comparisons), a single lab session with facial-expression images rather than participants' own real-life emotions, and a correlational brain-activity measure rather than a direct test of felt distress. It has since been cited very widely, but this is one study, not a settled mechanism.

05

What it may mean

Naming what you're feeling — even with a single, fairly ordinary word — may engage a different kind of processing than simply experiencing the feeling, and this appears linked to a calmer physiological state, at least in this experimental setting.

In real life

In real life that might mean the difference between sitting with a vague, swelling sense of dread and pausing to say (out loud or on paper) 'I'm anxious about the meeting tomorrow.' The situation hasn't changed, but naming it precisely may take some of the charge out of it.

Try this

Next time a feeling is running high, try naming it in one specific sentence — not 'I'm stressed' but 'I'm annoyed that I wasn't consulted' — before deciding what to do about it.

Evidence confidence

Moderate confidence

This is a single, small, frequently-replicated-in-spirit experiment rather than a large meta-analysis; later work has broadly supported the effect but sample sizes in this literature remain modest.

Source

Lieberman, M. D., Eisenberger, N. I., Crockett, M. J., Tom, S. M., Pfeifer, J. H., & Way, B. M. (2007). Putting a Feeling Into Words May Quiet the Brain's Alarm System. Psychological Science.

Peer-reviewed · Free full text available · Last reviewed 2026-08-14

Read the original research →

One study isn't the whole storyOne study gives us a piece of the picture. Selfey looks for patterns across the broader evidence rather than treating a single finding as a rule.

Read this in everyday terms

Naming an Emotion Changes It — Here's the Evidence

Selfey research briefs are educational summaries, not medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Research describes patterns across groups; it cannot tell you what is right for your situation.

Turn the evidence into a plan you can actually carry out.

Check in →